robber denies being in zambia
From CHALI MULENGA in Kazungula
A witness has told the Livingstone Magistrate Court
sitting in Kazungula as a mobile court in a preliminary inquire on an
aggravated robbery case that he could not tell whether at the time of the
crime, he was in Democratic Republic of Congo.
An employ of inter link Africa Harold Chaima of
Kazungula told the court that he could not confirm that the accused person was
in DRC.
Speaking during cross examination by Major (RTD)
Isaac Masonga from KBF and partners, who asked the witness on whether it was
possible to sneak into a foreign country and committing a crime.
In response Mr Chaima said he had heard that some were
able to sneak out of any country and commit a crime.
“I have proof to show that this is the man that was here
(at the scene of the crime), it is very possible for people to sneak into the
country and commit a crime,” Mr Chaima.
KBF partners asked the witness why he was using
information was from his girlfriend an immigration officer to increment their
client.
Mr Chaima
admitted having a girlfriend an immigration officer but however denied using
her to get information to increment the accused person.
“I have a lot of girlfriends, and I also have a
girlfriend an immigration officer at Kazungula border post and it is not true
that I used her to get information about the accused person to get the accused
person’s photo printed out,” he said.
This is in a case before Livingstone Magistrate
Naomi Sithole was Qubekani Dube, 47, a Zimbabwean truck driver based in South
Africa of Unit 166 Grassland estate
Boksburg North Gemstone South Africa, of NRC no. 53-025999E53.
Dube is charged with aggravated robbery contrary to
the section 294(1) of the penal code of the laws of Zambia.
It is alleged that, on 31st December in
Kazungula, Dube being armed with offensive weapons namely a pistol, jointly and
whilst acting together with another three unknown.
He did rob Harold Chaima off US$17,935.00 cash
equivalent to 89,675.00 and K15911.00.00 cash altogether valued at 105,586.00.
At or immediately before or immediately after such
robbery did or threatened to use actual violence to the said Chaima in order to
overcome resistance to the property being stolen.
The matter has been adjourned to the June 11 this
year for continued cross examination.
End.
Comments
Post a Comment